NỘI DUNG BÀI VIẾT
What is Acceptance Criteria? Definition, How To, and Best Practices
นอกจากการดูบทความนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถดูข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์อื่นๆ อีกมากมายที่เราให้ไว้ที่นี่: ดูความรู้เพิ่มเติมที่นี่
In Agile, acceptance criteria refers to a set of predefined requirements that must be met in order to mark a user story complete.
Read more about acceptance criteria: https://www.productplan.com/glossary/acceptancecriteria/
As a product manager or product owner, you may be responsible for writing acceptance criteria for the stories in your product backlog. In this video, we’ll define acceptance criteria, look at a few examples, and explore some best practices for writing it.
PCI lect5 acceptance sampling
Develop Your Self-Acceptance
Like this? Please subscribe, and join me on my new platform for personal development, https://GrowthDay.com.
Text me anytime at (503) 2126125 (U.S. Only)
DM me on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/brendonburchard
Get this episode’s summary, transcript, related quotes, and Apple podcast links:
https://brendon.com/blog/developselfacceptance
Complement with my latest audio podcast episode on THE BRENDON SHOW: http://bit.ly/TheBrendonShow
Like this? LIVE coaching from me every month: https://growthday.com
=====
DEALS
=====
Get my High Performance System and win this year: https://growthday.com/hps
Get my High Performance Planner, the best productivity planner and journal in the world: https://www.highperformanceplanner.com/
Get my brain supplement for mental focus and creativity:
https://www.hpxwellness.com
=====
FOLLOW ME
=====
YouTube Subscribe: http://j.mp/BrendonsYoutube
IG: http://Instagram.com/brendonburchard
FB: http://Facebook.com/brendonburchardfan
Podcast: http://bit.ly/TheBrendonShow
=====
GEAR SETUP
=====
Everything I use for filming is in my studio walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNNe0…
=====
ABOUT BRENDON
=====
Brendon Burchard is the world’s leading high performance coach, a 3time New York Times bestselling author, and one of the mostwatched, quoted, and followed personal development trainers in history. SUCCESS Magazine and O, The Oprah Magazine, have both named him one of the most influential leaders in personal growth and achievement. Forbes named him the world’s leading high performance coach and Larry King named him the world’s top motivational trainer.
Brendon’s personal development trainings have more than 300 million views. Over 2,000,000 students have completed his online courses and video series. He’s created 20 blockbuster online courses in personal and professional development, including the most popular motivation, confidence, habits, leadership, and high performance courses of all time. For these results, Oprah.com named him “one of the most successful online trainers in history.” Success Magazine named Brendon “one of the Top 25 Most Influential Leaders in Personal Growth and Achievement. ” Brendon has been on the cover of Success Magazine twice.
A 1 New York Times, 1 Wall Street Journal, and 1 USA Today bestselling author, Brendon’s books include High Performance Habits, The Motivation Manifesto, The Charge, The Millionaire Messenger and Life’s Golden Ticket. His most recent book, High Performance Habits: How Extraordinary People Become That Way, was a multiple week Wall Street Journal bestseller, and Amazon editors named it one of the “Top 3 Best Business \u0026 Leadership Books.”
Brendon is also the executive producer and star of THE BRENDON SHOW on Apple Podcasts, which debuted at 1 across all categories in its first season. It was a Top 10 SelfHelp podcast for over 100 weeks, and after 5 years continues to be a Top 20 charttopping health podcast.
Meet him at https://brendon.com/. Get his coaching on https://GrowthDay.com
What is Offer and Acceptance? (Contracts)
An Overview on Offer and Acceptance.
Contract Law – Acceptance
In order for there to be a fully formed contract there has to be an offer but that offer also has to be accepted.
When we think of acceptance we can split it up into the fact of acceptance and the communication of acceptance.
The fact of acceptance means looking at the circumstances in each case. Acceptance can occur through words, documentation or even actions (Brogden v Metropolitan Rly Co. (1877)).
If the courts find that the parties have each acted on the basis of the contract then it is likely that there will be thought to be acceptance and an intention to be bound by the terms (Hillas \u0026 Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd (1932)).
However it is also important that there is a sufficient degree of certainty and the courts should not engage in speculation (Scammell v Ousten [1941]).
Any acceptance has to be unreserved. Any form of continued negotiation or counteroffer has the legal effect of destroying the original offer (Hyde v Wrench (1840)).
This can be a difficult process because the counteroffer itself has to be distinguished from a request for more information (Stevenson v McLean (1880)).
Where there is an agreement that is ‘subject to contract’ then this will not be binding until the actual contract is signed unless there are clear words to the contrary (e.g. ‘provisional agreement’ in Branca v Cobarro [1947]).
Although slighly unusual in the law in general it is possible for a contract to have retrospective effect and therefore to legitimise past conduct (Trollope and Colls Ltd v Atomic Powers Constructions Ltd [1962]).
Certainty is a must in any contract but this fact can sometimes be used by people in a bid to avoid certain liabilities. Nevertheless if the courts find there to be a sufficient degree of certainty then liability will arise (British Steel Corpn v Cleveland Bridge \u0026 Engineering Co Ltd [1984]).
Whether there is a binding contract is based on objective analysis of the behaviour of the parties (RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller [2010]).
In some contracts, something as fundamental as the price might not have been agreed but if it is to be fixed based on some future condition then that will be sufficiently certain (Shell (UK) Ltd v Lostock Garage Ltd [1977]).
Tenders present an unusual problem because if a company agrees to take up to a certain amount of a particular item then that term lacks a certain amount of uncertainty. The law gets around this by determining there to be a separate contract for each requisition (Great Northern Rly Co. v Witham (1873)).
The second part of acceptance is the communication and this requires some form of words or action.
Silence will generally not constitute acceptance (Felthouse v Bindley (1862)).
However there may be instances in which the need for communication is waived by the offeror as in the famous case of Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Co [1893].
An offeror can prescribe a mode of communication by which acceptance is to be made but generally any method which is equally effective will suffice (Tinn v Hoffmann \u0026 Co (1873)).
Acceptance is not complete until it is received by the offeror (Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corpn [1955]).
When the parties are not in each other’s presence, the rule that acceptance must be communicated to the offeror is not very practical. As such the postal rule was created in Adams v Lindsell (1818) so that acceptance takes place when the letter is put in the post. However this raises further questions about whether acceptance can then subsequently be withdrawn by a quicker method.
Where the person who fulfils a contract has no knowledge of the offer there shall be no binding agreement (R v Clarke (1927)). However motive is not a relevant factor (Williams v Carwardine (1833)).
If two parties make identical crossoffers then this is not seen as creating agreement (Tinn v Hoffman \u0026 Co (1873)).
นอกจากการดูหัวข้อนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถเข้าถึงบทวิจารณ์ดีๆ อื่นๆ อีกมากมายได้ที่นี่: ดูบทความเพิ่มเติมในหมวดหมู่Tips
